
Harry S. Truman succeeding upon the death of Franklin D. Roosevelt, and was the 33rd president of the United States from 1945 to 1953. His judgment to denote the bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been highly disputed for decades.
The bombing proved to be a catalyst in the history of the world and weaponry for better or worse.
The decision Truman and his advisers made was the only arrangement that could have been made at that moment regarding the circumstances of World War II.
There are three cases regularly debated against the use of the bomb in 1945.
First, to use the bomb only against Japan was deemed racist; second, the bombings were unnecessary; and third, that it was done solely for political influence that was more related to the Soviet Union rather than with the war in the Pacific.
Although these contradictions make little sense when balanced next to the counterfactual reasoning about American alternatives.
Why is the Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Contested?
